The case is one of three gerrymandering claims that for months have been snaking through the federal and state courts in Pennsylvania.
The order came less than a week after the justices in Harrisburg heard arguments on the matter and made it clear they were seriously considering tossing out the maps. “We’re in such a chaotic, turbulent time right now, we have no idea what to tell candidates, or voters for that matter,” said Val Di Giorgio, state Republican chairman.
Congressional district maps are treated as regular legislation in Pennsylvania, and Wolf’s veto power gives him leverage. “If they want to avoid the courts, they have to negotiate with him, because he gets a huge card that he gets to play.” Wolf, who was named as a defendant in the case but essentially sided with the Democratic plaintiffs, supported the decision in a statement Monday. Supreme Court will have an interest in this.” He questioned whether the state or federal constitution gives Harrisburg justices authority to rewrite the maps. The case, was brought by the Philadelphia-based Public Interest Law Center under the state constitution, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has the final say on state law. Douglas, a law professor at the University of Kentucky and expert on election law, noted the order says the current map violates the Pennsylvania Constitution and that document is the “sole basis” for the decision.
“I will not accept a partisan gerrymander or a map that is unchanged from the one drawn in 2011,” he later tweeted. The timeline is what the timeline is, even though we disagree,” said Drew Crompton, the top attorney for Senate Republicans. “My sense is the majority is making that explicit, to say there’s no federal issue here,” Douglas said.
The state capital is Harrisburg but the two most populous and well known cities are Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. Search for Pennsylvania open public records online.In a move certain to upend state politics and the critical 2018 elections, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Monday that the state’s congressional map “clearly, plainly, and palpably” violates the state constitution and blocked its use in the May primaries.The justices, a majority of whom are Democrats, sided with a group of voters who contended that the state’s 18 U. House districts were unconstitutionally drawn to discriminate against Democrats.This site is updated regularly to bring you the newest services and records.The Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned the state’s congressional map Monday, declaring them an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.Republicans have consistently won the same 13 of 18 House seats since it was drawn in 2011, even as votes cast in the state were evenly split between the parties.Critics often point to the oddly shaped Seventh District outside Philadelphia, which they assert was designed to protect Republican Rep. It has been likened to “Goofy kicking Donald Duck.” Democrats have targeted the district, carried in 2016 by Hillary Clinton, in their effort to regain House control.You can also browse current housing and real estate data, property and land values.Connect with municipalities and law enforcement for the most up to date local information.Marcel Groen, chairman of the state Democratic Party, said a new map would “even the playing fields” in the Philadelphia suburbs and the Lehigh Valley.He said the party planned to fight “like hell” to win races there — “but there are no guarantees, and there shouldn’t be.” Michael Mc Donald, a redistricting expert at the University of Florida, predicted a new map would likely create four or five Democratic-leaning districts in Pennsylvania.